[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

26741: Boswell: (reply) Re: 26721: Morse (more comments) re: Wharram (commentary) Undermining Haiti (fwd)





From: Richard A. Boswell <boswellr@uchastings.edu>

Is there not a place for a more even-handed criticism? While excuses can or should be made for corruption under the Aristide government, I do not think that this paints the entire picture. Similarly, the fact that there was corruption does not justify a coup. Nor does corruption and bungling that might have given provided fuel to the effort to illegally remove the Aristide government, or the gross human rights violations that are occurring at this very moment.

I will also freely criticize the Castro government for its violations of human rights and acknowledge that freedom of speech is severely limited. But this does not mean that Castro has not done some very positive things in Cuba.

While it is very easy to try to paint things without using the full range of colors in the spectrum, to do so only brings out the defects in the image presented. .

I do not mean to convey the impression that there are not those situations where one can say that something is flat out bad/wrong. e.g. Castro's execution of a drug trafficker some years ago, or torture in the prisons or torture carried out by the U.S. government, and a host of wrongs that are carried out daily in other places including Haiti.

I have a hard time believing the mathematical calculation presented by Oloffsonram below. Truth can hardly be presented in such simple terms. To do so denigrates the suffering of those whose lives which have been snuffed out by the "opposition." And to say that someone deserves the suffering that they experience when it includes violence and killing is in mind wrong.